Welcome to the Plato Project.
 The myths of Plato and Homer are revolutionary scientific documents not only for the acknowledged reasons, but contain uknown -so far- information, hidden within the texts. 

“What has been written about Platonic Myth of Atlantis; what has been said, shown and debated  on where it might be and the nature of its demise

Is meaningless

Because  It is based on wrong translations of the original text …”


We ask for your constructive input. We welcome your scientific involvement.

Research is ongoing.

ATTENTION: Should you intend using material from this site, please first read the copyright page.

Up-coming – 2017 Conferences / Presentations.

(updated May 25, 2017)

2017 – June. Invitation of Mr. G. Sarantitis by the Homeric club of Ithaca, to present his last work.

Subject: Asteris and Dulichion. Two famous Islands of the Homeric Odyssey.

Mr. Sarantitis has already presented in the past in Ithaca  the works:

“The Ancient and modern Ithaca”.

“Origin of Ithaca’s name”.

“Methodology of Mythology”.

‘The Homeric Calendar and the Orion’s asterism”.



George Sarantitis

Dear Visitor,

What you are about to read in these pages, is part of a long and systematic research begun with the intention of re-examining Plato’s works of Timaeus and Critias.
Its original objective was exceeded by some of those achieved. The idea was to make a connotatively accurate translation through which to examine the logic of the ancient Greek myths and of Plato the Rationalist in the role of Mythographer. This sort of translation is probably without precedence. It is certainly not commercially viable at this stage. But it does provide the accurate sense of every word, phrase, line, paragraph and passage of the ancient text. To ‘study the logic of myths’, means to conduct an examination of a mythical account in order to see whether it contains connotations, terms, expressions or a particular form of writing in which can be identified possible axioms, laws, principles and rules or perhaps a systemic procedure that allows the taxonomy of what is true and what is false. To ‘study the logic of Plato’, means to seek the rationale of the mythographer and what method (if any) he applied when writing a myth and to determine whether he combined truths and falsehoods and if so, why.

Ultimately, to study what a myth is in purpose and in function because  the Ancient Greek Myths have shown that contain many and important true information. So, why one should write such a true story in a such way that looks false?

labor04bPlato was preferred because he has always been regarded as the representation of Rationalism, which somehow seems incompatible with creative writing.  Accordingly, the myth chosen as the most appropriate for examination was that of Atlantis because of its workable length -neither too long nor short-, its descriptive elements and the acknowledged authenticity of its author Plato.
The results of this taxing, in every aspect, investigation, as the reader will quickly come to appreciate from simply reading the information herein,  were entirely unexpected and cannot be regarded as anything less than astounding.

(As a whole, the cost of the first research has exceeded € 200.000 and has run into thousands of man-hours. Besides the wealth of information here, there’s much more and just as rich.)

Although the project’s initial intent was to study the logic in myths and mythographers and which study yielded an unexpected amount of data as well as a formal structure to myths, the investigation went on to lead to somewhere completely different and by so doing, reward the author with a magnificent prize (amongst many), namely, the full decipherment of the myth of Atlantis and revelation of the whole truth!

There now remains for the archaeologists to confirm these groundbreaking findings since, History seeks the truth, while Archaeology seeks the evidence.

The two parts of the Methodology of Mythology (MoM1 and MoM2) that follow are in brief outline and almost exactly as when presented at an international conference of Philosophy and at other scientific meetings and scholarly proceedings, where they made excellent impressions to corresponding acclaim. They reveal a hitherto unknown dimension to myths, at least to those written by Plato and Homer. It is the application of a singular method which sorts out the truths and falsehoods contained in the myth.  The MoM also revealed a way of writing which conceals information in outwardly straightforward text, information that would have been discernable only to whoever had been instructed as to this esoteric form of writing.

GYRYONIS_1The third part of the project is about Atlantis and its analysis in the book ‘The Apocalypse* of a Myth’. It deals with the decipherment of the myth and the identification of Atlantis as a physical entity. The reader of this site is recommended to go first into MoM1 & 2 and then into the part on Atlantis. It is not obligatory to follow this sequence but it will facilitate the reader’s realization that the recount of Atlantis is not a ‘regular’ story and has much hidden beneath the surface, even a tiny part is presented here. Certainly, Plato’s reports do not make for straightforward or easy comprehension. If they did, the ambiguity surrounding Atlantis for the past ~2.300 years would not have remained so mystifying, simply because it would have been resolved long ago. The reader of this website will almost certainly come to appreciate the words of warning and prior notice as to the aptitude for rational thought that Plato demands of his reader.

Herakles_Nemean_lion_Louvre_L31_1The same challenges in comprehension apply to the completed and comprehensive book ‘The Apocalypse* of a Myth’. A limited advance edition was published in Greek while the main and updated edition is in English. As assessed by many of the 200 or so test readers of the Greek edition, most being graduates from institutions of higher learning, the book ranges from decidedly thought provoking to highly exciting (for all Scientific fields) even if indeed challenging. Most who sought to fully understand all that the book contains admitted to reading it at least twice in full while going over certain aspects of it several times. It was truly gratifying to hear by many that they placed the book amongst those most often visited in their library, because of the plethora of useful information it contains in general for anyone wishing to delve further into ancient historical events or even for philosophical perspectives, irrespective of the Atlantis storyline.

A Professor of Philology has characterised these new connotatively accurate translations, as the most impressive news in Philology for centuries.
As a final point, because all these projects are based on new, exceedingly faithful translations of ancient texts and notwithstanding their numerous validations by Philologists of the University of Athens as to their connotative accuracy, an invitation-challenge with a money prize of €100.000 has been extended to anyone who can substantiate that these translations are inaccurate and cannot therefore support the schemata as presented in this website and elaborated on in ‘The Apocalypse* of a Myth’. And by so doing, demonstrate that all herein propounded are in disagreement with what Plato describes and are but figments of imagination and nothing to do with elemental logic and plain common sense.


see Lexical Disambiguation of ‘Apocalypse’

A few words about the present works. 

The whole study is divided into 10 parts.
Herewith in this site,  reference is made to three of them.

1) Methodology of Mythology (MοM). Part 1.
New connatatively accurate translations of Plato’s books TIMAEUS and CRITIAS, reveal another dimention in Plato’s way of thinking.

2) Methodology of Mythology (ΜοΜ). Part 2.

Plato’s Logic as mythographer; Light is shed on Plato’s methodology in his mythological reports.

3) ATLANTIS – “The Apocalypse* of a Myth” . Book-2008. Deciphering the most famous myth.

OUTLINE of 1 and 2.
New connotatively accurate translations were made of two of Plato’s important works, namely, the books of Timaeus and Critias in which Plato unfolds his story of Atlantis. These retranslations, made after thousands of hours of exacting and taxing intellectual labour, are of a very high degree of accuracy and divulge practically to the full all that was meant by him. To achieve said accuracy, one by one, all principally relevant words, phrases, sentences and paragraphs were processed and reviewed. To this end, fourteen (14) dictionaries and lexicons were referred to, being those the most preferable to the writer and widely recognised by the scientific community as to their authoritativeness and credibility. Besides the overall reconsideration, certain words under particular question were re-examined in the context of all Pre-Platonic texts in which they were found, while the sentences or phrases in which they were, were retranslated and subsequently reinterpreted.  It should be noted that in a few but important cases, new meanings were derived which were not given in most of the dictionaries but in just a few of them.

One may well ask “how is it, that other translations are inaccurate?” or, “how much of an issue can it be, should one translation be found to differ slightly from another?”
The answer, in relation to these works by Plato, is emphatically explicit. 
(See page: The importance of accurate translations).Accuracy in translation is of the essence, when the intention of the researcher of a literary work is to explore and identify the logic of the author and/or the writings. Quite simply, mistranslation = misdirection, so it cannot be stressed enough how absolutely essential it is to have connotatively accurate translations!

ThERAKLESThe initial phase of research had to do with detecting the Logic by which Plato fashioned his mythical narrative. Immediately afterwards, it had to do with detecting the logic pervading the myth. However, in order to proceed in investigation of either, as emphasized, an accurate translation is a must. Because all translations available on the international market are quite dissimilar, some being particularly so, it signifies that each translator had either made a faulty rendition or the original Ancient Greek codices were transcribed differently. If this was not the case, then all translations based on them would be relatively the same. The second case i.e. that of erroneous transcriptions was easily discounted because even those translations which exhibited differences as to the original ancient text, were not on points and issues which significantly altered the meanings in the various renditions by the various translators. Therefore, it was obvious that in order to proceed in research, a connotatively accurate translation was necessary. It should be noted that this insistence on accuracy in translation, concerns the study of the logic of myths and mythographers and not of any other writings or writers.

Thus, the most appropriate myth and mythographer were required for research. The Orphic Poets were excluded because of the plethora of inaccuracies and discontinuities in many of the ancient writings. On the other hand, Homer’s epics were much too long and the incumbent view that Homer is a fabulist or raconteur would have made this task not only too time-consuming but also less convincing in its end result.


Ultimately, Plato proved to be the ideal choice with his myth of Atlantis as the most suitable for research, for the following reasons:

1) Not even the most prejudiced cynic and obstinate sceptic can maintain that Plato is a non-rationalist without being derided. Accordingly, the very fact that an arch rationalist would engage in seemingly farfetched fiction, is in itself a motivational challenge to research. One would not reasonably expect such a person, especially in advanced age, as was Plato when he wrote about Atlantis, to commit flights of fancy in writing; unless they were grounded in fact.

2) The myth of Atlantis has been transcribed with noteworthy precision while the integrity of the author is beyond dispute.

3) The story of Atlantis is adequately long so as to allow research, since it’s neither too drawn out nor too short.

4) Precisely because it is the most talked about myth, giving rise to so many believable or unbelievable expositions, from the past to the present, to explore its logic was manifoldly challenging.
As a result of the laborious but meticulous translation of Plato’s two literary works in which he unfolds the myth of Atlantis, much hitherto unknown information was revealed, some being highly significant.

To begin with, there appears to have been an extraordinary method by which myths were structured. So, the myth is neither a tall tale with a few truths nor a factual recount with some fictional anecdotes. It is a completely unknown to date treatise, whose purpose is the scientific, intellectual and social edification of whoever requires part or whole of the instruction it has to offer, while being suitable for each intellectual age group. In other words, it is a generic work of literature, addressed to children, adolescents, mature grownups and even philosophers. This is true especially of the Homeric myths. Plato, on the other hand, focuses the educational nature of myths only to the intellectually mature and to advanced thinkers, such as are philosophers. Ingeniously, in the texts of myths, there is a confidential level that holds the knowledge of their time!
herakles_nessos_smUltimately, there is revealed an impressive structuring to when forming a myth that is governed by laws and axioms that characterize its architecture. That is to say, that every mythographer works within a framework of conventions whose boundaries are scientifically and rationally defined. So, while at first read a myth gives the impression of an easy to be assimilated document (in contrast to but a few relatively challenging ones), nobody, to date, had fully appreciated how valuable was its role in educating and ‘evolving’ the populace. With these conventions, every genuine myth can literally be “decoded”.

3) ATLANTIS – “The Apocalypse of a Myth” . Book-2008. Decoding the most famous myth.

(New version – Uploaded on July 20, 2011).

By applying the MoM to Plato’s myth of Atlantis, an end is given to the long quest for Atlantis and a cap put on Atlanto-mania. It solves a mystery whose creation was prompted mostly through inaccuracies and subsequently blown out of proportion by hyperbole.


On completion of the connotatively accurate translations of Timaeus and Critias, began the task of analysing the two books as a whole. Right away and for the first time in history, many surprises emerged such as three different islands, none of which sank. Specifically, Plato describes a continent-island, a large island which was temporarily inundated and a very small isle which became permanently flooded. He also portrays two canals instead of one and two lands named Gadeiriki. These were the first major  of many surprises. Next in line was the identification –through analysing Plato’s reports- of the approximate position of the Pillars of Heracles and the front edge of the continent of Atlantis. This location for the Pillars had first been suggested (modern times in 2005) by U. Hoffmann. In a later study (2008), G. Sarantitis, basing his theory on a number of relevant historical pieces of evidence, made an analytical presentation where he showed that the actual site of the Pillars of Heracles mentioned by Plato, was at the Gulf of Gabes. For first time Mr. Sarantitis has present analytically that it is Plato himself and also none other than Aristotle, who put the final seal of confirmation as to this location. Any researcher who propounds another point of view must first of all contest historically these analyses which contain information supplied by Plato and his pupil, Aristotle. Even as it is, from antiquity until today, nobody had a historically documented substantiation of the Pillars being in Spain and in Africa or at Gibraltar. This is the first time that so much and so very compelling data has been revealed and presented.

The newly retranslated texts offered up new schemata.

For example, the shape of the continent-island of Atlantis is defined as being semicircular with its length given at over 5.100 as an arc or 4.300 km in straight lines (addition in the new book’s version, 2013).

Also given, was the location of the island of Atlas as being “in the middle” of the continent. This island was rhombic, with 1:4 ratio sides and 300 km long.

Plato also describes a concentric system of alternate wheels of land and sea situated “inside” this island (which is “inside” the continent). Plato describes these wheels of land, giving the specific dimensions of every wheel, each with a unique natural or “constructed” geological feature.

herakles_andromachIn short, Plato describes in writing, an incredibly symmetrical geometrical design that begins with the continent and concludes with the hub of the wheels. According to the law of probability, it would be statistically impossible for such a land feature to exist, not only on Earth but anywhere in our Galaxy, on any of the millions or billions of planets orbiting the hundreds of millions of stars that constitute it.


The continent-island was (and may occasionally revert to being) all of Western Africa. The island, which is not so today due to aridness, is the ADRAR plateau in Mauritania, while the wheel system is the cyclical landform of Guelb et Richat, aka “the Eye of Africa”, as dubbed by the astronauts in orbit who first saw it in 1964! The hub of the wheels is the small isle which too is now exposed due to aridness.

Consequently, by scientific methodology and multifaceted research, the historical conundrum of Atlantis is deemed resolved. There remain to be conducted archaeological excavations as to the level of whatever civilization.

There can be no doubt that there are traces along the entire length of Western Africa, findings from the age of Atlantis. Indications of a very olden, practically common civilization that is much older than those of Egypt and Greece, as Plato reports them. Once identified, it remains for these findings to be evaluated.  This will certainly open up a new intriguing chapter in the book of humankind’s historical legacy. Once exploratory activities are set in motion, developments will be both numerous and impressive.

G. Sarantitis